O Joel κάνει πολύ καλές παρουσιάσεις, χρησιμοποιώντας τη slow motion camera. Αλλά ότι θα κάνει τέτοιο συγκριτικό με 25+ τσοκ δεν το ήξερα!
Το επόμενο θα είναι.
Το είπε στο τέλος του τελευταίου.
Αλλά ατσάλια φυσικά.
Στον Conetes του ζήτησα δοκιμή διάτρησης με μολύβια με διαφορετικά όπλα.
Μια ψόφια Benelli και την δική του την Moss.
Μου απάντησε ουσιαστικά ότι δεν θα δούμε διαφορές.
Η απάντησή του, χωρίς να την υιοθετώ 100%.
Yassou Bill!
Some of my family still lives in Greece, on the islands.
Penetration is a factor of 2 variables, velocity and the pellet fired. If you fire the same pellet at the same velocity, it does not matter what gun, choke, forcing cone, constriction, action, brand, ect was involved. Barrel length can play a factor in velocity, but that is about it. I have spoken with some shotgun manufacturers and they recommend making no changes to forcing cones. I think that in modern shotguns, the forcing cones are all pretty good and make no significant difference in performance and should have no impact on velocity at all, most of the acceleration occurs after the forcing cone anyway.
I do not have access to a Benelli presently to do that test unfortunately. But if the barrel length is the same, only the pattern could be different in any measurable way. Though it is possible that a ported barrel could slightly reduce velocity. So maybe the 930 would have a little less velocity. Really a Chronograph test would mean alot more here than a ballistics gel test. And I do hope to get a Chronograph this year. I think it could add a nice additional dimension to the testing.
If I gain access to a Benelli, I'll certainly keep this test in mind.
Thanks!
-George
